New Entries/Amendments for 2008-09-16

These are the submissions received via the WWW forms for this day. I (Jim Breen) will annotate the submission if I think it needs to be amended or rejected or if I have a question about it. Otherwise it can be assumed that it has been accepted. You can see how it will look in EDICT by looking at the "diffs" file for this day or the next in the diffs directory.
Annotations completed: 16 Sep.
Headword 1¥Õ¥¡¥¹¥È¥Í¥¨¥à
Part-of-speechn
English 1First name
NameJuhapekka Tolvanen
Submission Typenew
Editorial Comment Zero Googits. (¥Õ¥¡¡¼¥¹¥È¥Í¥¨¥à gets 6.) Where did you see it?

Headword 1¤ï¤µ¤ÓÂ纬
Headword 2»³°ªÂ纬
Reading 1¤ï¤µ¤Ó¤À¤¤¤³¤ó
Part-of-speechn
English 1horseradish
Cross-reference¥Û¡¼¥¹¥é¥Ç¥£¥Ã¥·¥å
Referencekoj, daij
NameRene Malenfant
Submission Typenew
Editorial Comment

Headword 1»³°ª¤ÎÌÚ
Reading 1¤ï¤µ¤Ó¤Î¤­
Reading 2¥ï¥µ¥Ó¥Î¥­
Part-of-speechn
Miscuk
English 1horseradish tree (Moringa oleifera)
Referencekoj, daij, wiki
NameRene Malenfant
Submission Typenew
Editorial Comment

Current Entry£ø£ø [¤Á¤ç¤á¤Á¤ç¤á] /(n) (sometimes also **, ¡û¡û, etc.) (See Éú¤»»ú) (m-sl) blankety-blank/used in place of sensitive word (often sexually related)/ (2193390)
Headword 1¡û¡û
Headword 1£ø£ø
Reading 1¤Á¤ç¤á¤Á¤ç¤á
Part-of-speechn
English 1(sometimes also **, etc.) (See Éú¤»»ú) (m-sl) blankety-blank; *bleep*
English 2used in place of sensitive word (often sexually related)
Commentshouldn't these ¡û¡û be on the headword/japanese side of the entry? (jdic doesnt support searching for ** so i left that)
Added "bleep" which is the English word for a beeping sound used for censoring, which as you know is usually accompanied by ¡û¡û on screen...
NameZ.
Submission Typeamend
Editorial Comment Is ¡û¡û read ¤Á¤ç¤á¤Á¤ç¤á? If not, it would need its own entry.


(0)
Current Entry¥¦¥©¡¼¥ë¥¹¥È¥ê¡¼¥È /(?) Wall Street/GA/
Headword 1¥¦¥©¡¼¥ë¥¹¥È¥ê¡¼¥È
Part-of-speechp
English 1Wall Street
Namescott
Submission Typenew
Editorial Comment

Current EntryÇÔËÌ [¤Ï¤¤¤Ü¤¯] /(n,vs) defeat (as a verb it means 'to be defeated')/(P)/ (1472610)
Headword 1ÇÔËÌ
Reading 1¤Ï¤¤¤Ü¤¯
Part-of-speechn,vs
English 1defeat (as a verb it means 'to be defeated')
ReferenceALC
Comment> defeat (as a verb it means 'to be defeated')

Wouldn't this be much more elegantly handled by splitting up n and vs?

n: defeat
vs: to be defeated
NameJeroen Hoek
Submission Typeamend
Editorial Comment Done.

Headword 1ç´ÇÓµ¤²»
Reading 1¤Á¤Ä¤Ï¤¤¤­¤ª¤ó
Part-of-speechn
English 1rectovaginal fistula;vaginal flatulence
Referencehttp://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/膣排気éŸ
NameRowena Silvestre
Submission Typenew
Editorial Comment rectovaginal fistula is ľIJç´áñ.

Current EntryÍ©Áë [¤æ¤¦¤½¤¦] /(n) quiet window/ (1540490)
Headword 1Í©Áë
Reading 1¤æ¤¦¤½¤¦
Part-of-speechn
English 1quiet window
ReferenceNelson 1600.11
See below.
CommentWith regard to the recent entries from David and Paul on the above, from my point of view, everything is worth keeping [and, indeed, including] unless there is some good reason to do otherwise, e.g., space restrictions, site management, etc.
As to the meaning of a 'dark window' which is also given in Nelson, there is bound to be a debate about poetic usage. Nevertheless, if I had read the poem referred to by Paul, and if I were wondering about meaning, I should have been very happy to go to your site and find the expression 'dark window' and then let my imagination take over in the context of the poem.
As to the part-of-speech, I am wondering whether the classification of 'expression' may not more properly describe the entry.
NameFrancis
Submission Typeamend
Editorial Comment I'll keep it with a note "(poet.)". If it exists, noun is OK I think.
I'd like one day to have a tag indicating that ther is doubt about a wor and it could/should be reviewed.

Headword 1¥í¥¤¥ê¥Ò¥ó
Part-of-speechs
English 1Reuchlin
ReferenceSee below.
CommentIn text that I was reading, there was a quotation attributed Ãú. ¥í¥¤¥ê¥Ò¥ó (1455-1513). I found a reference to ¸Åŵ³Ø¼Ô¡¤¿Íʸ³Ø¼Ô Reuchlin (ROIRIHIN) classicist and humanities scholar, but I am not sure about the prefix 'Ãú'. That is all I have, but your data for names is comprehensive and I wondered if this should be included.
NameFrancis
Submission Typenew
Editorial Comment Fine for enamdict.