| Headword 1 | みんなの党 |
| Reading 1 | みんなのとう |
| Part-of-speech | n |
| English 1 | Your Party (a Japanese political party) |
| Reference | Japanese Wikipedia; various news media |
| Name | linguist |
| Submission Type | new |
| Editorial Comment |
| Current Entry | 大なた [おおなた] /ax/panga/WI1/ |
| Headword 1 | 大なた |
| Reading 1 | おおなた |
| Part-of-speech | n |
| English 1 | (see 大なたを振るう) big hatchet |
| Reference | ニューセンチュリー和英辞典 |
| Comment | nobody else has this. I suspect it's only used with 大なたを振るう |
| Other language option | eng |
| Name | Scott |
| Submission Type | new |
| Editorial Comment | Added to 大鉈 entry. |
| Current Entry | 大なたを振るう [おおなたをふるう] /(adj) meat-ax/(vt) to meat-ax/act cruelly/make a drastic cut/prune severely/slash severely/take great strides/demonstrate courage to/take draconian steps in/WI1/ |
| Headword 1 | 大なたを振るう |
| Reading 1 | おおなたをふるう |
| Part-of-speech | exp,v5u |
| English 1 | make a drastic cut |
| English 2 | prune severely |
| English 3 | slash severely |
| English 4 | lay the axe to |
| Reference | gg5 |
| Other language option | eng |
| Name | Scott |
| Submission Type | new |
| Editorial Comment |
| Current Entry | 大鉈 [おおなた] /(n) big hatchet/ (1786970) |
| Headword 1 | 大鉈 |
| Headword 2 | 大なた |
| Reading 1 | おおなた |
| Part-of-speech | n |
| English 1 | big hatchet |
| Comment | seems like this was already in edict |
| Other language option | eng |
| Name | Scott |
| Submission Type | amend |
| Editorial Comment |
| Current Entry | 大鉈を振るう [おおなたをふるう] /(exp) (obs) to make drastic cuts/ (2102450) |
| Headword 1 | 大鉈を振るう |
| Headword 2 | 大なたを振るう |
| Reading 1 | おおなたをふるう |
| Part-of-speech | exp |
| English 1 | (obs) to make drastic cuts |
| Other language option | eng |
| Name | Scott |
| Submission Type | amend |
| Editorial Comment |
| Current Entry | 高専 [こうせん] /(n) (prewar) college/ (1283670) |
| Headword 1 | 高専 |
| Reading 1 | こうせん |
| Part-of-speech | n |
| English 1 | (See 高等専門学校) (abbr) technical college |
| Reference | koj, daijr, daijs |
| Other language option | eng |
| Name | Rene Malenfant |
| Submission Type | amend |
| Editorial Comment |
| Current Entry | 弱 [なよなよ] /(n) weak/delicate/supple/ (1009460) |
| Headword 1 | なよなよ |
| Part-of-speech | adv-to,adv,vs |
| English 1 | delicately |
| English 2 | weakly |
| English 3 | gently |
| English 4 | supplely |
| Reference | koj, daijr, daijs, meikyo |
| Comment | no kanji in any entry i could find
|
| Other language option | eng |
| Name | Rene Malenfant |
| Submission Type | amend |
| Editorial Comment |
| Headword 1 | なんでよつ |
| Part-of-speech | adv |
| English 1 | Why?! Why not?! What for? What's wrong? |
| Reference | Ranma 1/2 manga chapter 9 page 14 |
| Comment | Seems to be a wh- question with an emphasis of importunity (yo tsu). probably not polite speech, but useful to know for some occasions. |
| Name | Richard Rudinger |
| Submission Type | new |
| Editorial Comment |
| Current Entry | 弁護士道徳 [べんごしどうとく] /etiquette of the profession/WI1/ |
| Headword 1 | 弁護士道徳 |
| Reading 1 | べんごしどうとく |
| Part-of-speech | n |
| English 1 | legal ethics |
| English 2 | WI1 |
| Other language option | eng |
| Name | Jim Baldwin |
| Submission Type | new |
| Editorial Comment |
| Headword 1 | メトロポリタンエリアネットワーク |
| Part-of-speech | n |
| English 1 | Metropolitan Area Nework; MAN |
| Comment | "Network" is misspelled |
| Name | Name |
| Submission Type | amend |
| Editorial Comment |
| Current Entry | 耐屈曲 [たいくっきょく] /(n) stiffness/resistance to bending/ (2436950) |
| Headword 1 | 耐屈曲 |
| Reading 1 | たいくっきょく |
| Part-of-speech | n |
| English 1 | stiffness |
| English 2 | resistance to bending |
| Reference | ALC defines 耐屈曲性 as both "flex resistance" and "flexibility." |
| Comment | I see this word used in the opposite sense, to mean "flexible" or "bend-tolerant". For example, with reference to a sensor cable to be used on moving equipment: "可動部での使用を考慮し、耐屈曲性の高いファイバを採用". I suggest adding "flexibility, bend-tolerance" to the definition.
|
| Other language option | eng |
| Name | Fritz Knobloch |
| Submission Type | amend |
| Editorial Comment | I suspect the original version was wrong. |